The execution gap
Most restructuring programs miss execution, not the plan
What restructuring is, why it fails in operations, and how to track execution from commitment to confirmed impact.
Restructuring is what happens when the plan and the operating result diverge. The board signs off on a savings target, the operators try, and six months later the result is half of what was promised. The majority of programs hit only partial savings. The gap is not in the strategy; it is in the execution between the plan and the people doing the work.
Where it breaks
Initiatives stall in execution, not in planning
You set a savings target. The board approves. Six months later, you are reading a status update that says green on the slide and red on the operator's spreadsheet. The majority of restructuring programs miss their declared savings target. The pain is not in the strategy deck. The pain is in the lag between board commitment and operating reality, and in the absence of a shared view of what is actually happening this week.
Initiatives look green on a slide while the underlying maturity remains at L1 or L2
Excel spreadsheets become the source of truth, and three different versions circulate among workstreams
The bank asks for covenant reporting and the operating data is three weeks behind the steering deck
Without one single source of truth on initiative maturity, the steering committee debates last week's data instead of this week's decision.
By the numbers
The cost of execution failure, measured by the firms that price it
Restructuring failure is not theoretical. The same firms that advise on these programs publish what failure costs when execution slips. The numbers below come from the practices that price these mandates.
How ChangeMaker solves restructuring
Restructuring is execution discipline. ChangeMaker makes the gap visible.
Most restructuring programs stall because the operators and the board see different versions of the same initiative. ChangeMaker closes that gap with a behavioral-execution layer and the patented PerformanceMap — every initiative from L1 (idea) to L5 (impact confirmed), with the same Härtegrad view at operations, PMO, and board level.
Behavioral execution layer
Neuroscience-informed design that nudges operators to update Härtegrad weekly and surfaces stalls before they reach the steering committee. Not another PPM tool with new branding — the layer that actually gets adopted.
PerformanceMap (patented)
A visual maturity status across every initiative in one screen. The CEO sees what is L4 versus L2 without a slide deck or a weekly rollup. The L1-to-L5 Härtegrad model is the shared language.
From shopfloor to boardroom
The same Härtegrad view at all three levels — operators, PMO, senior management. Steering meetings stop being about whose Excel is current and start being about which initiative needs a decision today.
Ready from day one, full rollout in ten business days. 150x shareholder return versus license cost across the PM install base, validated over 20,000+ initiatives, 100 transformations, and €8 bn+ of EBITDA under management.
Before you book
Common questions buyers ask about restructuring
What is the difference between restructuring and turnaround?
When does a restructuring need an IDW S6 plan?
How is ChangeMaker different from a PMO tool?
How long does deployment take?
What if our initiatives currently run in Excel?
Book a demo
See ChangeMaker applied to your restructuring
A 30-minute demo with your data shows you what L4 versus L2 looks like across your own initiatives, and how the Härtegrad tracker stops the green-on-the-slide pattern in your weekly review.
- Walk through how Härtegrad maps onto your existing restructuring plan
- See a worked example of the steering-committee view operators do not edit
- Get a deployment plan that has ChangeMaker live from day one — full rollout in ten business days